Matthew Campbell, Paris
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
FRENCH troops in Afghanistan suffered one of their worst military defeats since the Algerian war of independence, leaving President Nicolas Sarkozy facing one of the biggest crises of his political career as he came under attack for supporting Nato against the Taliban.
Amid an unprecedented display of national doubt and soul-searching, parliamentary hearings on the French role in Afghanistan were being scheduled to address growing public concern about young men being used as “cannon fodder” in a war against a seemingly invincible enemy.
On Thursday Sarkozy, visibly shaken as he stood before the flag-draped coffins of 10 soldiers killed in an ambush, praised the bravery of young men “cut down in the flower of youth” and insisted that France would continue to pull its weight in the multinational Nato force that is struggling to keep the Taliban, or “barbarians”, as he called them, from power.
It emerged on Friday that 55% of the public want French troops out of Afghanistan and Sarkozy was under attack for having broken the promise he made during his election campaign last year to bring the troops home. Instead, he agreed in April to send an extra 700 after pleas for more help from America.
Until recently most of the blood being spilt in an increasingly vicious conflict has been British and American, while the French were operating in what was a relatively peaceful area in and around Kabul, the capital.
The French losses in a single battle on Monday were almost as great as their total of 14 casualties since 2001 and shocked the nation into the realisation that, rather than just another peace-keeping mission, Afghanistan was a real war.
“The government must stop sending children to their deaths in this slaughterhouse,” said Joël le Pahun, father of Julien, who was shot dead by a sniper on his 20th birthday when he went to the aid of a friend who had been wounded in the ambush. The friend later died.
Another 21 soldiers were injured in the battle, an extraordinarily high toll, and French generals were under pressure to explain what had gone wrong.
Why, for example, had no aerial reconnaissance been conducted before the convoy of up to 100 men set off towards the Uzbin valley on Monday afternoon, when this was known to be a potentially dangerous route? And why, after the fighting broke out, did it take so long for help to arrive and for the injured to be evacuated?
Adding to public outrage were allegations that some troops had been killed and injured by “friendly fire” when US special forces called in air strikes against the attackers.
Most of the soldiers who died were from the Eighth Parachute Regiment, whose baptism of fire was at Dien Bien Phu, the battle in northern Vietnam in 1954 that has gone down in history as one of France’s worst military debacles. “The eight”, as the regiment has come to be known, was almost entirely wiped out.
It was reborn in time to fight the Algerian rebels in 1956 and its men were at the front of a column of armoured vehicles that set off on Monday afternoon from the French base along the road linking Kabul with the Pakistani border. They were backed by Afghan army troops and a unit of American special forces.
About 30 miles east of Kabul, the column halted at 1.30pm so that scouts on foot could patrol ahead, where the road climbed in a series of hairpin bends to an altitude of 6,500ft.
Choked by clouds of red dust and in blazing heat, the men walked into an ambush in which several were picked off by snipers, including the radio operator.
The commanding officer was killed and his deputy was shot in the arm. The latter managed to operate the radio, calling for help. There was little cover, leaving the survivors exposed to Taliban guns.
Their isolation increased when the Taliban cut off their retreat by encircling their armoured vehicles. Reinforcements were summoned, as well as American jets. At 5.50pm, two American helicopters tried to evacuate the wounded but could not land because of gun-fire. It was not until 8pm that French helicopters were able to evacuate the wounded.
At 4am a French armoured vehicle helping to evacuate troops plunged into a ravine, killing a soldier.
At 9am the Taliban were still lobbing the occasional mortar at French positions despite the thunderous fire being hurled at them by two American A-10 “tankbusters”.
An estimated 40 Taliban were killed.
Sarkozy, addressing the coffins of the dead soldiers and their grieving relatives, said: “I want us to learn everything that we can from what happened [so that] none of your colleagues will ever find themselves in such a situation.”
It was the first time he had addressed an assembly of grieving war widows. He hopes it will be the last. President Hamid Karzai criticised US forces for “unilateral operations” after an attack killed 78 mourners at a wake.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The French will stay. Sarkozy is solid.
When disparaging the French, it is as well - for Americans in particular - to remember the crucial role they played in the War of Independence. Hollywood begs to disagree, but the rebels simply could not have won without French help.
Be grateful chaps.
Bob, Liverpool, England
"Nicolas Sarkozy in line of fire"... And didn't his government put soldiers in a more dangerous one, shamelessly deploying units mounted on aluminum APCs without slat armor or teleoperated MGs and not one of the several combat tested PTN & COY level UAVs?
What is the real cost of 10 corpses then?
RONNIE, PARIS, FRANCE
The US neglect of Afghanistan after Bush decided to illegally invade Iraq led to calls for help from NATO and the europeans in a conflict that is entirely US made and fomented. All euro forces should be pulled out; the more Americans tied up there = less chance of them starting trouble in Crimea.
Robert, Houston, USA
They are a part of the army that occupies Foreign country for no reason, so be prepared for some soldiers to die!
Nobody's crying for the dead Afghans or Iraqis!
French being very proud of their REVOLUTION, I don't think they'll be happy if somebody occupied their country!
George B, London, UK
It's first time I read something like this (a blog?). First thing I see, - all from America do know what our troops are fighting for; comments from EU - they do not know. Why? No one politician sends troops without reasons, (it's their capital, a bargain chip). Don't they justify reasons in EU?
Sergey, Brooklyn, NY
I hope Sarkozy will remain firm in his resolve and not give in to protests back home. Standing united adds strength. Folding means turning tail and run.
Richard Irish, Indianapolis, USA/Indiana
why are nato involved in America's war, What did the afghanis do to the USA or nato. It was not that along ago The UN was praising the Taliban for bringing peace to the country and for stopping opium production. The world must stop this 100 metre dash to choas and brave world leaders must speak out
imran khan, Coventry, uk
The Americans pressured NATO on behalf of the Canadians. The English-speaking few carry the weight of the entire organization.
I was impressed with Sarko that he took up the call. As tragic as this is, I hope he doesn't lose his spine now. The French public will only confirm the old jokes.
Fernandez, Tacoma, Washington, USA
It is strange to read Mr.Sarkozy calling the Taliban "terrorists". As has been commented by another reader, the US responded like a mad elephant and stamped wherever it could after the towers were brought down by terrorists. Afghnistan has a more difficult problem, drugs and an unstable Pakistan.
Krishnan, Mumbai, India
It is sad that those oldiers died, but what do you expect when USA destroyed there country for its own gain. They will never defeat terrorists in Afganistan and Pakistan because its there country. USA should learn when is defeated. This war will go until every Talibani is killed mission impossible.
Mark, Leeds, UK
What are French or any other troops doing in Afghanistan? "Crushing terrorists"? Not a single Afghani has "terrorized" a single American. The Americans bombed these people in revenge for 911 and for geopolitical reasons. American involvement has led to a massive loss of innocent lives. Stop this!
Jim, Blackburn, UK
Being a world power is being able to take a bloody nose and keep fighting when it is the right thing to do. The French soldiers are tough and more than willing to pull the load, my son has worked with them many times, all they want is support back home. The same goes for the Canucks & Brits.
Al , Tracy, USA
Dont want to get into a numbers "contest" but British casualties are way higher than the Canadians.
If the French pull out now, they will never live it down,
"The Cheese eating surrender monkeys" epithet will forever live in their ears.
It would also show that NATO is defunct.
Malc, Yeovil,
However, we are very happy with the support from our colonies.. keep up the good work.
All the troops out there are doing a great job, wotever their nationality may be
Steve, Sunderland, Great Britain
Mr. Sarkosy should take the opportunity, after these tragic losses, to have all the countries involved in Afghanistan to rethink their strategies.History has shown that no foreign military involment has succeeded in crushing terrorist groups on their own territory. It's time for a change of approach
Michelle, Silver Spring, USA
When speaking about putting Mr Sarkozy in the line of fire, there remain the embarassing question on where and when did he himself do his military service ? As a People politician, what a surprise no pix of him in an army uniform never showed up...
Cagliary, Casablanca,
Matthew Campbell is wrong in saying that most of the blood spilt has been British or American - the Canadians in Kandahar have lost 93 men to date and have been in Afghanistan longer than the British.
James, St Albert, Canada
Well we just lost 9 fireman in Oregon, USA! 10 army guys is not going to put Mr. Nicolas Sarkosy in the line of fire...
By the way congratulation to Mr. Sarkosy on dealing with the Russian so far so good.
Jacques, Grants Pass, USA