You need Flash Player 8 or higher to view video content with the ROO Flash Player.
Click here to download and install it.
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
Tales from victims' relatives and survivors | Spanair defends troubled takeoff | Chaos at airline | Airline's troubled history | What went wrong? | Full passenger list
Angry relatives of Madrid crash victims asked yesterday why the aircraft was allowed to fly two hours after it aborted a take-off because of a technical fault.
A total of 153 people died on Wednesday when the Spanair aircraft bound for the Canary Islands failed to take off, crashing shortly beyond the runway and bursting into flames. Nineteen people were injured.
Spanair officials confirmed that the pilot aborted his first take-off attempt after noticing that an air intake under the cockpit window was overheating. Javier Mendoza, the airline’s deputy managing director, said that the problem was treated and corrected by maintenance personnel, who switched off power to the intake – standard procedure for the McDonnell Douglas MD82 aircraft.
His explanation did little to quell the anger of relatives who gathered at a makeshift mortuary in a convention centre to identify the bodies.
One survivor, Ligia Palomino, said: “The plane was wobbling from one side to another. I don’t know what happened next. I was in a sort of river and saw people, smoke, explosions.”
An air hostess in an Iberia aircraft that was coming into land heard her captain exclaim: “That plane is not taking off. It’s eating up the runway!” She said the Spanair aircraft’s left engine exploded when it was about 70 metres in the air and fell “like a leaf”.
She said: “As it swerved, its left wing touched the ground, there was an explosion and the plane broke apart.”
A Spanish pilots’ union claimed that Spanair, which is cutting jobs, was asking pilots to carry out repair work because of a shortage of maintenance personnel. Spanair, a subsidiary of Scandinavian Airlines System (SAS), rebuffed the criticism, insisting that the company had an exemplary safety record. Swedish media also reported that there were 166 passengers on the flight list even though SAS’s annual report says that the maximum number of seats is 150. SAS said it was normal to put extra seats on aircraft and that this had nothing to do with safety.
There were also reports yesterday that the 15-year-old aircraft was due to be retired from service later this year.
One theory is that thrust reversers, normally used only at touchdown, were deployed. That would explain why the pilots were unable to control the craft despite reaching normal take-off speed. In 1991, a Boeing 767 crashed in Thailand with the loss of 223 lives when the thrust reverser went into operation automatically.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Despite all the outrage and speculation over safety lapses in these comments I have to say I am surprised. At any given time there are enough people to populate a small city flying through the air. That accidents like this happen so rarely is testament to the safety procedures used in aviation.
Stephen Gillanders, Derby, UK
To Dupont ..As someone who has lived in Spain these last 25 years ,i have to agree with you .The blame will be shifted to SAS .Anyway ,no one here would ask for a repair at lunch time . People switch off to eat and drink Hora de comer whixh is 3 horas is sacrosanct . I am not surprised .
jack, palma de mallorca, spain
If the pilots thought the fault was serious they would not have taken off...remember they are dead too. This plane was under 15 years old and the type has an excellent safety record. The truth is that technical faults happen. Lets wait and see the enquiry findings before judging and blaming
chris Jones, belfast, uK
Harry, obviously you have experience with flying these planes, and there were design flaws with the set up (which they tried to address in the DC9) - but the stats show that the MD80 is one of the safest passenger jets ever made.
nik, london, uk
The old DC 9 and renamed MD80 plus has always been an unsafe aircraft coming from someone flying the blasted thing on and off for 40 yrs. Its setup was wrong from the start and a supercritical wing didnt help either, they were cheap and retiring em now wd bankrupt airlines. rock and hard place
Harry Boerma, St James, Barbados
But just why are MD-82 planes still are allowed to fly ? That plane is a disaster. I will never get on board. Remember the West Caribbean crash in Venezuela with passengers going back to Martinique from Panama ? All dead !!
Daniel, Paris, France
It is best to fly with solvent, non-budget airlines on Boeing/Airbus with a union pilot (ie highly-trained -often ex-military- not overworked, can't be fired for refusing to fly shoddy plane).
Such airlines carry too many rich people to risk their lives- their families can afford lawsuits.
Lizzie, London,
Here in Fuerteventura, Spanair are notorious for making late (fuel-saving) turns onto finals. Not necessarily dangerous, but quite dramatic.
It's also about time that a safety zone around runways was required. We have a gas station directly under final approach, then a nasty gully.
Paul M, Puerto del Rosario, Spain
Spanair is most certainly not a budget airline. It competes with Iberia, not Easyjet and Ryanair.
Andrew, Bilbao, Spain
The whole country is terrified, how could this happen? We hope that this serves as a lesson to 1. NOT USE THE SAME PLANE IF IT HAS PREVIOUSLY HAD PROBLEMS & 2. LET PASSENGERS GET OFF THE PLANE.
letty, madrid, spain
This problem exists in America too.
The airlines say that because our mechanics are held by law to higher standards that even though they get pay cuts they will always still do there best to insure conformance to FAA standards.
I call that unfounded optimism.
Don't fly if crews aren't happy!
steve, newark ca., usa
All airlines are concerned for their profits - of course they care about safety, but some are now taking risks based on previous 'false alarm' experiences in the search to save money. Why was the field a 'tinder box' allowed next to the runway? Where was the 'low ignition' fuel additive? All so sad.
Steve Wegerif, Nuneaton, UK
Lets' hope that the people at the top of this airline are punished if they have been cutting corners and ignoring safety operating procedures. By punishment I mean charged with murder or manslaughter and stuck away for the rest of their lives.
Michael, Bracknell, UK
Given the stupendous increase in air travel over the last ten years this should be used as a warning sign about the dangers of taking things for granted.
Marek, London,
Mike Cooper, your point is not only unimportant but totally irrelevant. Was it made out of vanity, lest anyone think you took low cost flights?
Alan Leishman, Manchester, UK
let us all prey for the poor souls who lost their lives and the grieving relatives.
rosa wolson, durham, england
i think indirect blame goes to oil speculators in new york for such high rise in fuel
andy, cambridge, england
Good question. Worse is when the TV crews shove cameras and microphones in their faces so we can all watch them weep. They might as well poke them with a stick and say "go on, cry won't you". Why is such treatment of the bereaved normal?
Luke, Hereford, U.K.
It might seem unimportant after such a tragic accident but your article today about Spanair defending the take off describes them as a budget airline. I find this quite misleading. Their schedule domestic flights have always cost around the same as Iberia and Air Europa with higher quality service.
Mike Cooper, Marbella, Spain
Just so sad for those who lost their lives and for the friends and relatives who will grieve for them.
Let us trust that the Spanish Authorities do all that they can to help those involved.
Willie Mac, Arden, Scotland
Why do newspapers have to publish photographs of distraught family members and friends at these times? What does it add to the story? I think we might guess that knowing your relative has been burnt to death is somewhat upsetting.
S. Turner, Fife, UK