You need Flash Player 8 or higher to view video content with the ROO Flash Player.
Click here to download and install it.
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
Tales from victims' relatives and survivors | Spanair defends troubled takeoff | Chaos at airline | Airline's troubled history | What went wrong? | Full passenger list
Cabin crew aboard the the ill-fated Spanair flight which crashed on take-off at Madrid airport yesterday refused to let a passenger off despite earlier technical problems with the aircraft, the man's family said today.
The chilling accusation came to light as the budget airline defended its decision to clear the MD-82 jet for take-off despite aborting an earlier attempt because a gauge showed an overheating air-intake valve. The device was switched off and the flight went ahead.
Of the 172 people aboard flight JK5022, only 19 survived. Witnesses said the plane's left-hand engine burst into flame as it lifted off the runway and the aircraft broke up and crashed back to earth in flames.
The plane is designed to be able to take off even if one engine fails, but aviation sources in Spain suggested today that the burning engine might have spun round and thrown deadly debris into the aircraft's rudder and right-hand engine. Another hypothesis emerging today was that the plane deployed its reverse-thruster, normally used at touchdown.
As relatives of those aboard the plane waited for news of their loved ones, their anger has focused on why Spanair allowed the pilot to take off despite the aircraft's problems. Javier Mendoza, deputy director of operations for the company, told a press conference that all standard procedures had been followed.
The story of the passenger forced to remain aboard emerged at the Madrid hotel taken over by the airline to host relatives of the victims.
Spanish media said that an unidentified woman at the hotel told reporters that her husband had texted her at 12.30 pm - almost two hours before the accident - saying: "My love, there's a problem with the plane."
She phoned him back and told him to get off the flight, but he said: "They won't let me off."
The woman's son, Ruben Mateo, 22, told reporters: “My mother called him and said that he should get off but my father said they would not let him."
Relatives of the passengers were arriving today at a Madrid convention centre, which also used as a makeshift morgue after the al-Qaeda train bombing of March 2003. Only 37 of the bodies have been identified so far.
"I’d kill the bastard who did this," one man shouted at a television crew as he drove past the building.
Priests and psychologists comforted distraught relatives overnight at Barajas airport and at the Las Palmas airport on Gran Canaria, where flight JK5022 was headed. The plane was operating on a codeshare with Lufthansa although only four Germans were aboard the flight, a Bavarian family whose fate remains unclear.
According to a list published by Spanair, the vast majority of the passengers were Spanish, but officials said that there were also passengers from Sweden, the Netherlands and Chile.
The plane was 15 years old, bought by Spanair from Korean Air in 1999, and was overhauled in January.
As three days of national mourning were declared, Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, the Prime Minsiter, interrupted his holidays in southern Spain to fly to the scene. The Spanish Olympic Committee said the Spanish flag would fly at half mast in the Olympic village in Beijing.
Spanair, owned by the Scandinavian airline SAS, has been struggling with high fuel prices and tough competition. It announced it was laying off 1,062 staff and cutting routes after losing some £40 million in the first half of the year.
Air safety experts pointed out that Europe had been free of major plane disasters in recent years but take-offs still posed the greatest risk for flight crews.
The MD-82 should be able to lift off with only one engine, and pilots are trained for such eventualities, but one hypothesis that emerged today was that the plane's thrust reversers, normally only used for when it touches down, could have been deployed. That would explain why the pilots were unable to control the craft despite reaching normal take-off speed.
In May 1991, a Lauda Air Boeing 767 crashed in Thailand with the loss of 223 lives when the thrust reverser automatically went into operation.
"Automatic thrust reverser deployment will be one of the things that air crash investigators will be looking at," said Dr Guy Gratton of the school of engineering and design at Brunel University in West London.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Despite all the outrage and speculation over safety lapses in these comments I have to say I am surprised. At any given time there are enough people to populate a small city flying through the air. That accidents like this happen so rarely is testament to the safety procedures used in aviation.
Stephen Gillanders, Derby, UK
To Dupont ..As someone who has lived in Spain these last 25 years ,i have to agree with you .The blame will be shifted to SAS .Anyway ,no one here would ask for a repair at lunch time . People switch off to eat and drink Hora de comer whixh is 3 horas is sacrosanct . I am not surprised .
jack, palma de mallorca, spain
If the pilots thought the fault was serious they would not have taken off...remember they are dead too. This plane was under 15 years old and the type has an excellent safety record. The truth is that technical faults happen. Lets wait and see the enquiry findings before judging and blaming
chris Jones, belfast, uK
Harry, obviously you have experience with flying these planes, and there were design flaws with the set up (which they tried to address in the DC9) - but the stats show that the MD80 is one of the safest passenger jets ever made.
nik, london, uk
The old DC 9 and renamed MD80 plus has always been an unsafe aircraft coming from someone flying the blasted thing on and off for 40 yrs. Its setup was wrong from the start and a supercritical wing didnt help either, they were cheap and retiring em now wd bankrupt airlines. rock and hard place
Harry Boerma, St James, Barbados
But just why are MD-82 planes still are allowed to fly ? That plane is a disaster. I will never get on board. Remember the West Caribbean crash in Venezuela with passengers going back to Martinique from Panama ? All dead !!
Daniel, Paris, France
It is best to fly with solvent, non-budget airlines on Boeing/Airbus with a union pilot (ie highly-trained -often ex-military- not overworked, can't be fired for refusing to fly shoddy plane).
Such airlines carry too many rich people to risk their lives- their families can afford lawsuits.
Lizzie, London,
Here in Fuerteventura, Spanair are notorious for making late (fuel-saving) turns onto finals. Not necessarily dangerous, but quite dramatic.
It's also about time that a safety zone around runways was required. We have a gas station directly under final approach, then a nasty gully.
Paul M, Puerto del Rosario, Spain
Spanair is most certainly not a budget airline. It competes with Iberia, not Easyjet and Ryanair.
Andrew, Bilbao, Spain
The whole country is terrified, how could this happen? We hope that this serves as a lesson to 1. NOT USE THE SAME PLANE IF IT HAS PREVIOUSLY HAD PROBLEMS & 2. LET PASSENGERS GET OFF THE PLANE.
letty, madrid, spain
This problem exists in America too.
The airlines say that because our mechanics are held by law to higher standards that even though they get pay cuts they will always still do there best to insure conformance to FAA standards.
I call that unfounded optimism.
Don't fly if crews aren't happy!
steve, newark ca., usa
All airlines are concerned for their profits - of course they care about safety, but some are now taking risks based on previous 'false alarm' experiences in the search to save money. Why was the field a 'tinder box' allowed next to the runway? Where was the 'low ignition' fuel additive? All so sad.
Steve Wegerif, Nuneaton, UK
Lets' hope that the people at the top of this airline are punished if they have been cutting corners and ignoring safety operating procedures. By punishment I mean charged with murder or manslaughter and stuck away for the rest of their lives.
Michael, Bracknell, UK
Given the stupendous increase in air travel over the last ten years this should be used as a warning sign about the dangers of taking things for granted.
Marek, London,
Mike Cooper, your point is not only unimportant but totally irrelevant. Was it made out of vanity, lest anyone think you took low cost flights?
Alan Leishman, Manchester, UK
let us all prey for the poor souls who lost their lives and the grieving relatives.
rosa wolson, durham, england
i think indirect blame goes to oil speculators in new york for such high rise in fuel
andy, cambridge, england
Good question. Worse is when the TV crews shove cameras and microphones in their faces so we can all watch them weep. They might as well poke them with a stick and say "go on, cry won't you". Why is such treatment of the bereaved normal?
Luke, Hereford, U.K.
It might seem unimportant after such a tragic accident but your article today about Spanair defending the take off describes them as a budget airline. I find this quite misleading. Their schedule domestic flights have always cost around the same as Iberia and Air Europa with higher quality service.
Mike Cooper, Marbella, Spain
Just so sad for those who lost their lives and for the friends and relatives who will grieve for them.
Let us trust that the Spanish Authorities do all that they can to help those involved.
Willie Mac, Arden, Scotland
Why do newspapers have to publish photographs of distraught family members and friends at these times? What does it add to the story? I think we might guess that knowing your relative has been burnt to death is somewhat upsetting.
S. Turner, Fife, UK