Valerie Elliott, Consumer Editor
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
World-renowned chefs have plunged their knives into the Michelin restaurant guide, known by many as the bible of gastronomy. The 108-year-old “red book” is accused of being out of touch and too commercialised.
The attack, in next month’s Waitrose Food Illustrated, is led by Marco Pierre White, who became the youngest chef to win three Michelin stars. He gave them up nine years ago when he quit day-to-day cooking.
He is now concerned about the varying standards between Michelin restaurants in 17 cities throughout the world. Their ratings were too commercial and inconsistent, he claimed. He tells the magazine: “I’ve dined in Michelin-starred places in New York and I’m confused. There are at least fifty restaurants in England as good as the two-star restaurants over there, rather than the paltry ten that currently hold that number.”
Chefs are no longer interested in the straitlaced cooking styles admired by Michelin inspectors and instead have concentrated on serving unpretentious hearty meals.
Yves Camdeborde, who runs the Parisian bistro Le Comptoir, said: “What we represent is popular culture, not cuisine de snob. But despite our high standards and 12-month waiting list, we’re of no interest to Michelin. It’s an informal bistro specialising in great regional cooking and yet again it scarcely rates a flicker on Michelin’s scale. Who is the winner? One thing’s for sure: it’s not Michelin’s readers.”
Toshiya Kadowaki, owner of Azabu Kadowaki, turned down the chance to appear in Michelin’s Tokyo guide, which was published for the first time last November. He can serve only 21 in his restaurant and did not wish to attract tourists.
He said: “Imagine if I went to Paris and started pronouncing upon the food served in French restaurants. The French either wouldn’t take me seriously or they wouldn’t be very happy. Well I don’t think Michelin should do the same here in Japan. Who are they to judge my food and decide if I am worthy of one, two or three stars — or no stars at all?”
William Sitwell, editor of Waitrose Food Illustrated, said that he had heard a lot of dissatisfaction from chefs about the Michelin guide. “They all told me the guide was championing food that people no longer wished to eat. It seems to me that too many chefs are slaving in the kitchen to please Michelin and get stars, when people are looking for less poncey and more normal food.”
He denied it was “sour grapes” from chefs and suggested that Michelin was no longer relevant to them.
He was also unsure whether diners needed the Michelin judgments any more. “We’ve moved on from these preachings and I think more and more people go by word of mouth when choosing where to eat. People use the internet and sites such as trustedplaces.com, which gather communities of like-minded people.”
Jean-Luc Naret, director of Michelin guides, said: “Let the readers be the judges — if they are buying we are happy. Chefs are, broadly speaking, supportive of our judgments even though they may not always be happy with them. He also told the Evening Standard: “Quite a few of these chefs have never received the distinction of being in the guide, so perhaps there is a little bitterness there. Others are not interested in Michelin stars. Anyway, what they say is not true. In England we were the first guide to recognise that pubs as well as restaurants serve very good food.”
Michelin sells more than a million guides a year. The first guide, by André Michelin, on French restaurants, appeared in 1900. His aim was to help motorists — who drove cars that used his tyres — to choose the best places to stop for lunch or dinner.
The red book’s top British restaurants
Three stars
Fat Duck, Bray, Berkshire
Waterside Inn, Bray
Gordon Ramsay, London
Two stars
Andrew Fairlie at Gleneagles, Perthshire, Scotland
Midsummer House, Cambridge
Gidleigh Park, Chagford, Devon
Le Champignon Sauvage, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire
Le Manoir au Quat’ Saisons, Great Milton, Oxfordshire
Capital, London
Gavroche, London
Petrus, London
Pied à Terre, London
The Square, London
Vineyard, Stockcross, Berkshire
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
This article appears to address two completely separate points:
Point 1 - the Michelin guide is inconsistent in its reviews across the world; and
Point 2 - the Michelin guide is out of touch with what diners require from a restaurant guide.
The former may be true although I do not have enough experience, personally, to say. I will, however, be interested to read what a chef, who is clearly in a position to make the judgement, says on this.
With regard to the second point, I disagree. The Michelin guide is probably the best guide to consult if you are looking to dine in a restaurant that focuses on fine dining/ gastronomic experience.
If you are looking for a great, rough and ready Sunday lunch, then consult a guide with a different focus. The Michelin Guide, as far as I am aware, has never pretended to be a one stop shop for all types of restaurant. It focuses on one particular style and standard of food that is as relevant and popular today as it has ever been - if not more so.
Jay, London,
Good on you, Marco. Go get 'em.
Michelin is indeed outdated and awards are based upon mysterious French ideals that nobody understands or, frankly, cares about. And the top awards always seemed skewed towards French cuisine. Why is that?
Friends bought me a Michelin guide for Christmas and I haven't even opened it yet.
For truly unbiased reviews and opinion, type the name of your proposed restaurant into your internet browser, add the word review, that's all there is to it. And it's free...
Teddy Hunter, New York,