Devika Bhat and Sarah Maslin Nir
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000

Gap years. Bright young things jet-setting off to far-flung locations to serve as temporary eco-warriors and save the planet, simultaneously blasting the ozone with harmful C02 emissions courtesy of the very flights and 4x4s often required to transport them to their destinations.
Such has been the uncomfortable disparity facing students wishing to do good abroad, while keeping their green credentials in check. In recent years, the dilemma has led to several gap year companies and websites issuing advice on how individuals can lower their personal carbon footprint in order to offset the damaging effects caused by numerous flights of a few thousand miles. Now one company, Trekforce, has gone further than many firms, by taking proper note of the quandary facing would-be gappers, and pledging to do something about it.
Starting from this July, all conservation missions by Trekforce will be carbon neutral, with the organisation promising to undertake sufficient eco-friendly activity to offset the damage caused by harmful emissions.
In calculating the extent of environmental damage caused by gap-goers, the company will take into account flights made, the pollution emitted by passenger vehicles and even the exhaust of the tractors used to haul volunteers and equipment into rainforests to carry out projects. Working with the World Land Trust, the final figures will be converted into planting a sufficient number of trees in Ecuador to offset the impact.
John Burton, Chief Executive of World Land Trust said: “Despite the link between aviation and climate change, it is important to be realistic about travel. The important thing is for people to travel responsibly and that means offsetting flights."
The company's actions testify to the growing conundrum facing the globally-minded gapper. But while most are eco-conscious and starkly aware of the problems associated with global warming, many appear to unintentionally overlook the likely harm of travelling across oceans and continents by air in order to help preserve the Costa Rican rainforest or Thai sea turtles.
It’s something that can escape the most well-intentioned gapper. Lydia Ross, a student at the Sorbonne in Paris says: “The environment is something I think about, but I wouldn’t have thought about the impact of a [gap year company.] The environmental impact factors in when I think about where I get my food and my electricity, but I just don’t think about it when it comes to these sorts of things.”
While the efforts by companies such as Trekforce are generally considered laudable, some students aren’t quite convinced that having a carbon neutral gap year on offer will make a difference to them. Jaime MacConville, a first year at UCL, says: “Most people go on gap years for selfish reasons. It’s usually for their CV; they make friends with people [like them] not local people. It’s an extended holiday, that stuff won’t matter to some.”
The matter is clearly something of a minefield for the next generation, with a survey carried out last year revealing complex and conflicting attitudes towards green living. In a study of almost 55,000 17 to 21-year-olds, almost all those questioned (91 per cent) said they expected the effects of climate change to be felt by 2031, largely for the worse, while more than half perceived themselves as more concerned about the environment than their parents' generation.
However, very few (just 4 per cent) said they had decided not to take a flight because of green concerns, with 67 per cent saying they would not give up flying for environmental reasons in the next ten years. Interestingly though, almost half (46 per cent) said environmental considerations were significant when deciding what organisation to work for - a factor which could spell good news for gap year companies and corporate firms alike willing to make the extra effort to raise their eco credentials.
Rob Murray-John, Director of Trekforce, says: “There are times when there is no choice but to fly in order to carry out the worthwhile work Trekforce and its volunteers do, deep into some of the most remote parts of the world. Our aim is to leave behind sustainable projects which benefit the area long term.
"By employing local guides; buying local food and sourcing wood for the project from local farmers or already fallen trees and by pledging to make their expeditions carbon neutral, we will make sure that we are doing everything possible to travel responsibly and increase the positive effect the expeditions are having on the environment."
Is being green on your gap year an important consideration for you? Tell us what you think below:
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip

|
| |
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Having come to the end of my internship with a gap year conservation organisation i would agree that some companies are essentially fat cats sitting in plush offices getting rich off their profits. This is not remotely true of many others...if a company is not totally transparent about where your money goes then alarm bells should ring. For those that take you to the furthest flung places (which are often those that get forgotten about in both assistance and their own country's aid) need the safety and support which, believe it or not, does cost money.
And for those that claim air travel is only a small percent...well isn't it the point that it is all the small things that add up to a huge amount. Yes, homes and work contribute the most, but turning off switches at home others might feel that these are 'small' things. And while i too in the past have taken flights with little thought, my attitude has now changed. If i can afford to fly, i can afford to offset.
Rosie Williams-Wynne, London,
Conservation organisations that purport to be 'conscious' yet are effectively profit-making companies are the worst sinners in this game of carbon neutralisation.
Its all about feel-good factor with the gap-year conservation market, young people aiming to go and do some good, paying a fortune for the opportunity, get sent on low-cost trips by these organisations claiming green credentials that frankly anyone can claim.
Spend your 3 or more grand on reducing poverty, providing alternative energy options or cleaning up polluted seas in the third world instead of helping these guys get richer and richer.
rebecca turner, sheffield, uk
Air travel? Give me a break. 2% of worldwide emissions. If you want to make a dent in your carbon footprint, cut down on the volumes of electricity (mostly coal-fired plants, unless you're in France or Norway) you help consume every day. Big industry and electric utilities together account for over half of all GHG emissions, add in industrial farming/livestock, and you'll see why the only reason air travel is getting hammered is because it's the shortest route to making individuals feel the most guilty while letting off the vast majority of the most serious polluters. We, as naive consumers, will fret over air travel and other such non-issues, spending millions to buy offsets and whatnot, when the real culprits laugh all the way to the bank with their profits.
I'm not saying air travel is harmless (it's not), it's just that there are so many larger, more pressing causes of GHG emissions that deserve public action. Air travel is a red herring.
Farkas, Utrecht,
I feel like a complete hypocrite when it comes to green issues. I have just finished my third year at university and am working for a renewable energy company. I feel strongly that people should cut their CO2 emissions and on a daily basis I do what I can to do this. However I am also planning a series of long haul trips over the next 2 years for entirely selfish purposes. I feel that although I want to reduce my carbon footprint I also want to live a life where I feel I have seen and done as much as can within reason. Carbon saving starts at home and although flying does contribute its our homes and work places that are the largest contributors.
tom, chippenham, uk